Bernard Bolzano’s philosophical conception of education from a modern standpoint
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.1.32.44Słowa kluczowe:
philosophy of education, logic, textbook, communication between teacher and students, Bernard Bolzano’s pedagogical ideasAbstrakt
Aim. The aim of the article is to analyse Bernard Bolzano’s philosophico-educational approach, given the importance of his pedagogical legacy for further progress in the field of education and training.
Methods. The research uses methods of historico-philosophical reconstruction (to determine the foundations and features of Bolzano’s pedagogico-philosophical work), interpretation (to characterise the still relevant ideas of the thinker in the field of education) and critical analysis (to assess the significance of Bolzano’s legacy from the standpoint of modern educational theory and to point out what remained out of the researchers’ attention).
Results. The study showed that Bolzano’s pedagogical ideas were not only in demand in the context of European culture of the early XIX century, but also proved relevant today, especially given the need for harmonious personal development, finding sources of intrinsic motivation in students and improving their logical thinking skills, the importance of the spiritual qualities of the teacher and – in general – the assistance of the state in the direction of the progress of education as the most effective means of qualitative change in society.
Conclusion. Bernardo Bolzano’s philosophical conception of education was strongly influenced by religion, the ideas of the late Enlightenment and the late Josefinist. This conception was an integral part of his socio-political theory. Bolzano attached great importance to the study of philosophy and the acquisition of logical skills in education. He considered writing textbooks to be one of the cornerstones of the educational process. This made it possible to intensify communication between teachers and students, to gradually involve everyone in education, and thus to promote social progress in general.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Bibliografia
Beaney, M. (2013). Chronology of Analytic Philosophy and Its Historiography. In: M. Beaney (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy (pp. 61-140).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bolzano, B. (1810). Beyträge zu einer begründeteren Darstellung der Mathematik 1. Prag:
Widtmann.
Bolzano, B. (1836). Autobiographie des Dr. B. Bolzano. In: Lebensbeschreibung des Dr. B.
Bolzano mit einigen seiner ungedruckten Aufsätze und dem Bildnisse des Verfassers
eingeleitet und erläutert von dem Herausgeber (pp. 1-88). Sulzbach: J. F. Seidelschen
Buchhandlung.
Bolzano, B. (1837). Wissenschaftslehre. Versuch einer ausführlichen und größtentheils neuen
Darstellung der Logik mit steter Rücksicht auf deren bisherigen Bearbeiter. Sulzbach:
J. E. v. Seidel. 4 Bde.
Bolzano, B. (1849). Was ist Philosophie? Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller.
Bolzano, B. (1850). Über die Vaterlandsliebe. Dr. Bernard Bolzano’s Erbauungsreden an die
akademische Jugend. Bd. 2 (pp. 145–156). Prag: Heß.
Bolzano, B. (1887). Řeči vzdělávací akademické mládeži. Praha: Fr. A. Urbánek.
Bolzano, B. (1950). Paradoxes of the Infinite. D. A. Steele. (trans.). London: Routledge.
Bolzano: Gesamtausgabe (1969ff). Critical edition. E. Winter, J. Berg, F. Kambartel,
B. van Rootselaar (Eds.), Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzboog. Retrieved from:
https://www.frommann-holzboog.de/editionen/20?lang=en-gb.
Bolzano, B. (2007a). Natural Morality / Treatise of the Science of Religion, part 1, §§ 86–95,
In: Bernard Bolzano, Selected Writings on Ethics and Politics (pp. 199-229), P. Rusnock, & R. George (trans.). Amstermam; New York: Rodopi.
Bolzano, B. (2007b). The little book on the best state or Thoughts of a friend of mankind on the
most suitable institutions for civil society. In: B. Bolzano. Selected Writings on
Ethics and Politics (pp. 235-356). P. Rusnock, & R. George, (trans.). Amstermam,
New York: Rodopi.
Casari, E. (2016). Bolzano’s Logical System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dubislav, von W. (1929). Lieber Bolzano als Kritiker Kants. Philosophisches Jahrbuch,
, 357-368.
Føllesdal, D. (1997). Bolzano’s Legacy. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 53(1), 1-11.
Huemer, W. (2004). Husserl’s critique of psychologism and his relation to the Brentano school.
In: A. Chrudzimski, & W. Huemer (Eds.), Phenomenology and Analysis: Essays on
Central European Philosophy (pp. 199-214). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lorenzová, H. (1998). Bernard Bolzano – Pedagogue. The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World
Congress of Philosophy, 43, 89-92.
Rusnock, P., & George, R. (2007) Introduction. In: B. Bolzano, Selected Writings on
Ethics and Politics (pp. 1-42) (P. Rusnock & R. George, Trans.). Amsterdam, New
York.
Simons, P. M. (2013). Bolzano, Tarski, and the Limits of Logic. In: P. M. Simons, Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays (pp. 13-40). London: Springer.
Sirůček, P., & Jaroslav, Š. (2019). Bernard Bolzano – Utopian Visionary. Acta Oeconomica
Pragensia, 27(3-4), 95-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.631.
Synytsia, A. (2013). Аналітична філософія [Analytic Philosophy]. Lviv: ЛДУФК.
Zdenek, V. D. (2008). Masaryk and the Austrian philosophical tradition: Bolzano and Brentano.
Filosoficky Casopis, 56(3), 345-361.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2021 Andrii Synytsia
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
