Investigation of multi-criteria method for the assessment of sustainable development: The case of Lithuania

Autor

  • Roberta Kareivaitė Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Šiauliai University, Architektu st. 1, LT-78366, Šiauliai, Lithuania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20151.271.280

Słowa kluczowe:

multi-criteria method, sustainable development, complex assessment, SAW method

Abstrakt

The process of implementing sustainable development started at the end of the 20th century with the aim to balance economic, social and environmental development and minimize damage to humans and the environment. Nowadays, when new economic problems emerge social interest groups  lobby, environmental standards are raised, sustainable development becomes an integral part of  democratic society and is a particularly relevant object of scientific investigations. Taking into consideration the aspect of sustainable development complex assessment, the research problem can be formulated as follows: how to assess sustainable development comprehensively? This research, according to statistical data analysis (Lithuania’s case), identifies multi-criteria method (SAW) as the best method of analyzing sustainable development from the approach of different dimensions (economic, social and environmental).

According to the results of SAW method, it can be noted that when a country is improving economic indicators, environmental indicators usually decrease, which in turn determines the characteristics of the social dimension slight decrease.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Bibliografia

Antuchevičienė, J., Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). Modelling renewal of construction objects applying methods of the game theory. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 12(4), 263–268.

Belton, V., & Steward, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Brauers, W. K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics 35(2), 443–468.

Brauers, W. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Peldschus, F., & Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-objective decision-making for road design. Transport 23(3), 183–192.

Chankong, V., & Haimes, Y. Y. (1983). Multiobjective decision-making – theory and methodology. New York: North-Holland.

Čiegis, R. (2004a). Economics and environmental. Sustainable development management. Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University Press.

Čiegis, R. (2004b). Sustainable agriculture: Economic aspects. Ekonomika 68, 7-23.

Čiegis, R. (2004c). The new approaches towards sustainability. Tiltai 2(27), 65-70.

Čiegis, R. (2009a). Sustainable development dimensions and stages. Modelling the European future: integrating the old and the new. The 4th Scientific volume, 139-143.

Čiegis, R. (2009b). Development of sustainable agriculture in Lithuania. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos – kaimo verslų ir jų infrastruktūros plėtrai 16 (1). Retrieved from http://baitas.lzuu.lt/~mazylis/julram/16/30.pdf.

Čiegis, R., & Gavenauskas, A. (2005a). The management of sustainable development: ethical aspects. Tiltai 4, 31-38. Retrieved from http://etalpykla.lituanistikadb.lt/fedora/objects/LT-LDB-0001:J.04~2005~1367151313994/datastreams/DS.002.0.01.ARTIC/content.

Čiegis, R., Ramanauskienė, J., & Martinkus, B. (2009). The concept of sustainable development and its use for sustainability scenarios. Engineering economics 2(62), 28-37.

Čiegis, R., Tamošiūnas, T., Ramanauskienė, J., & Navickas, K. (2010). Darnaus industrinių zonų vystymosi vertinimas [Sustainable industrial development zone evaluation]. Šiauliai: Šiauliai University Press.

Dasgupta, P. (2007). Measuring Sustainable Development: Theory and Application. Asian Development Review 24(1), 1-10.

Du Pisani, J. A. (2006). Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environmental Sciences 3(2), 83-96.

Engel, J. R., & Engel, J. G. (1990). Ethics of environment and development: Global challenge, international response. London: Belhaven Press, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Estes, R. J. (1993). Toward Sustainable Development: From Theory to Praxis. Social Development Issues 15(3), 1-23.

Faneli, D. (2007). The world is moving away from sustainable development. The New Scientist 196(2624), 10-20.

French, S., Simpson, L., Atherton, E., Belton, V., Dawes, R., Edwards, W., Hamalainen, R. P., Larichev, O., Lootsma, A., Pearman, A., & Vlek, C. (1998). Problem formulation for Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: report of a workshop. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 7(5), 242–262.

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2004a). Complex evaluation of the use of Information Technologies in the Countries of Easters and Central Europe. Journal of Business Economics and Management 5(4), 183–191.

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2004b). Quantitative evaluation of corporate strategic potential. Business: theory and practice 5(1), 3–9.

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2005). The formation of multicriteria evaluation indicator system. Business: theory and practice 6(4), p. 9–12.

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2007a). Complex assessment of sustainable development of state regions with emphasis on ecological and dwelling conditions. Ecology 53 (Supplement), 41-48.

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2007b). The effect of complex evaluation the reliability of calculation results. The 14th International Scientific Conference Enterprise Management: Diagnosis, Strategy, Efficiency. Selected papers, 27-30.

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2008a). The problem of compatibility of various multiple criteria evaluation methods. Business: theory and practice 9(1), 73-80.

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2008b). A feasibility study of multicriteria methods‘ application to quantitative evaluation of social phenomena. Business: theory and practice 9(2), 81-87.

Ginevičius, R., Podvezko, V., & Bruzgė, Š. (2008). Evaluating the effect of state aid to business by multicriteria methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(3), 167–180.

Hacking, T., & Guthrie, P. (2008). A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom-Line, Integrated and Sustainability Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28(2-3), 73-89.

Hjorth, P., & Bagheri, A. (2006). Navigating towards sustainable development: A systems dynamics approach. Futures 38, 74-92.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. S. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making/Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Hwang, C. L., & Lin, M. J. (1987). Group decision-making under multiple criteria. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Kalibatas, D., & Turskis, Z. (2008). Multicriteria evaluation of inner climate by using MOORA method. Information Technology and Control 37(1), 79–83.

Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47(3), 8–21.

Lee, K. N. (2001). Human–Environment Relationship: Indicators. In: Smelser, N. J., & Baltes, B. (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, 7045-7050. The Netherlands: Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Lithuanian Macroeconomic Review (2005). No. 3(23), Retrieved from http://www.seb.lt/pow/content/seb_lt/pdf/lt/lma23.pdf.

National strategy for sustainable development (2011), Retrieved from http://www.am.lt/VI/index.php#a/8084.

Nader, M. R., Salloum, B. A., & Karam, N. (2008). Environment and sustainable development indicators in Lebanon: A practical municipal level approach. Ecological Indicators 8(5), 771-777.

Odum, H. T. (1994). The energy of natural capital. In: Jansson, A.M., Kolke, C., & Costanza, R. (Eds.) Investing in Natural Capital, 200–212. Island Press.

Pearce, D., & Atkinson, G. (1998). The concept of sustainable development: an evaluation of its usefulness ten years after Brundtland. CSERGE Working Paper PA 98-02, Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.116.8122&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Pearce, D.W., Barbier, E., & Markandya, A. (1990). Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World. UK: Biddles Ltd., Guildford and King’s Lynn.

Peldschus, F., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2005). Fuzzy matrix games multi-criteria model for decision-making in engineering. Informatica 16(1), 107–120.

Sage, A. P. (1977). Methodology for large scale systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sivilevičius, H., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2008). Quality attributes and complex assessment methodology of the asphalt mixing plant. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3), 161–166.

Staniškis, J. K., Arbačiauskas, V., & Stasiškienė, Ž. (2008). Strengthening corporate commitment to sustainable development: Lithuanian approach. 1st Global Cleaner Production Conference and Exhibition, 1-9.

Štreimikienė, D., Čiegis, R., & Jankauskas, V. (2007). Darnus energetikos vystymasis [Sustainable energy development]. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press.

Štreimikienė, D., & Kovaliov, R. (2007). Business and implementation of sustainable development. Management of organizations: systematic research 41, 151-168.

Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision-making methodologies: A comparative study (Applied Optimization). Volume 44. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Peldschus, F. (2009). Multi-criteria Optimization System for Decision Making in Construction Design and Management. Engineering Economics 1(61), 7-17.

Ustinovičius, L., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2004). Statybos investicijų efektyvumo sistemotechninis įvertinimas [Decision support system in construction]. Vilnius: Technika.

Wilson, J., Tyedmers, P., & Pelot, R. (2007). Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics. Ecological Indicators 7(2), 299-314.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2007). Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building’s regeneration alternatives. Building and Environment 42(1), 436–451.

Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Peldschus, F., & Turskis, Z. (2007). Multi-attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS method. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 2(4), 195–203.

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitienė, J., & Marina, V. (2008a). Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria. Technological and economic development of economy 14(4), 462–477.

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitienė, J., & Marina, V. (2008b). Selection of construction Project managers by applying COPRAS-G method. Computer Modelling and New Technologies 12(3), 22–28.

Zavadskas, E. K., Zakarevičius, A., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2006). Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multicriteria decisions. Informatica 17(4), 601–618.

Zimmermann, H.J., & Gutsche, L. (1991). Multi-Criteria Analyse. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2020-01-05

Jak cytować

Kareivaitė, R. . (2020). Investigation of multi-criteria method for the assessment of sustainable development: The case of Lithuania. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 6(1), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20151.271.280

Numer

Tom 6 Nr 1 (2015): Journal of Education Culture and Society

Dział

LOCAL CULTURES AND SOCIETIES

Licencja

CC-BY

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.